Jenifer V. Helms, Laura Stokes, Inverness Research
A "conference" is a familiar mode of work for academics. As common as conferences are, however, they are quite challenging to design in ways that truly succeed in galvanizing the attention of an academic community on a shared problem, in generating powerful new understandings, and in energizing and shaping an agenda for future research and development work that will move a field forward. Conferences may aspire to these ends, but as typically designed, rarely achieve them. This paper presents a case study of a conference—the PCK Summit—that provided an exceptionally powerful experience for the participants—both individually and as a professional community—and is pushing forward important work in the field.
The PCK Summit brought together a group of 22 researchers from 7 countries who are working in the area of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) in science. The meeting achieved three outcomes:
- Formation of professional learning community, where individuals put aside their niche perspectives to work for collective intelligence
- Conceptual advancement, with emergence of new consensus model of PCK
- Field development, with new research and policy agendas for individuals and the collective
This paper elucidates the key elements of the PCK Summit's design and the reasons for its success. Our hope is that others in NSF and beyond may derive practical lessons about how to conceptualize, prepare for, facilitate, and follow up on academic conferences so that they succeed in building individual, community, and field capacity.
Education philanthropists and funders, K-12 and higher education leaders, educator professional associations, STEM improvement leaders
March 2013
Any and all errors are claimed by the authors of this document, Inverness Research
Inverness Research grants permission to print and distribute copies.
These links will launch an Acrobat Reader document. If you do not have the Adobe Acrobat Reader, click the button shown above. |